Sweden
Regulatory Risk Rating
Moderate
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Moderate
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
Very Low
Corruption Exposure Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
| Regulatory Risk Rating Factors | Risk Level |
|---|---|
| 1st Come / 1st Serve | Subscribe |
| Application Criteria | Subscribe |
| Duration | Subscribe |
| Right to Renew | Subscribe |
| Competing Licences | Subscribe |
| Mineral Coverage | Subscribe |
| Right to Mine | Subscribe |
| Criteria for Mining Rights | Subscribe |
| Tenure | Subscribe |
| Surface Rights | Subscribe |
| Government Take | Subscribe |
| Transfer Rights | Subscribe |
| Change of Control | Subscribe |
| EIA Process | Subscribe |
| Power to Revoke | Subscribe |
| Age of Legislation | Subscribe |
| Other Factors | Subscribe |
Like neighbouring Finland, Sweden's mineral law is a well-drafted and well-thought-out piece of legislation; with its Minerals Act Sweden is truly leading the way in terms of mineral policy in Europe and its fellow EU Member States would be wise to take note and follow the examples provided by the Scandinavian nations.
Contents
Regulatory Risk Rating
Moderate
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Moderate
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
Very Low
Corruption Exposure Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk