Sweden
Regulatory Risk Rating
Moderate
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Moderate
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
Very Low
Corruption Exposure Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
Regulatory Risk Rating Factors | Risk Level |
---|---|
1st Come / 1st Serve | Subscribe |
Application Criteria | Subscribe |
Duration | Subscribe |
Right to Renew | Subscribe |
Competing Licences | Subscribe |
Mineral Coverage | Subscribe |
Right to Mine | Subscribe |
Criteria for Mining Rights | Subscribe |
Tenure | Subscribe |
Surface Rights | Subscribe |
Government Take | Subscribe |
Transfer Rights | Subscribe |
Change of Control | Subscribe |
EIA Process | Subscribe |
Power to Revoke | Subscribe |
Age of Legislation | Subscribe |
Other Factors | Subscribe |
Sweden's mineral law is a well-drafted and well-thought-out piece of legislation which provides a clear pathway from exploration to development. As with many countries in Europe, environmental and local community challenges may prove problematic and the discretionary areas of the law do little to offset these risks. These issues aside, Sweden should be recognised as a leader in terms of mineral policy in Europe.
Contents
Regulatory Risk Rating
Moderate
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Moderate
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Regulatory Corruption Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk
Very Low
Corruption Exposure Risk
Corruption Exposure Risk