login
Forgot password?
not registered yet? Register
Available for sponsorship
flag
  • GDP, US$bn: 1,257.9
  • GDP per capita, US$: 53,657.3
  • Population, mn: 24.0
  • Inflation, CPI ave: 1.3
  • FX, LCY/US$: 1.3
  • Budget Balance, % of GDP: -2.2
  • Mining GVA, US$bn: 73.9
  • Mining Industry Value, US$bn: 116.1
Country: Australia

BMI Index

Western Australia BMI Index

74.5

Country: Australia

Purchase reports
Hutte Score
63
0
100
Low Risk
View Report

Fraser Institute

Western Australia Fraser Institute PPI

Ranked 9 out of 104 Countries

2016

Access Ratings

Hutte Score

The Western Australia mining regime is a sophisticated regime with map and ground staking, extensive provisions concerning surface rights and private owner conflicts, work expenditure obligations, filing requirements and retention licences, but it also is quite a complicated regime that shows its age through patchy revisions that lack elegant drafting overhauls. At the heart of the legislation is the right to mine a discovery, but the complications of the regime create difficulties for the uninformed and work for the legal advisor.

subject review score
1st Come / 1st Serve The principle explicitly operates (ss. 67, 75(7)). (See also s. 105A.) 3
Application Critiera Open to any person but must specify criteria under s. 58(1)-(2) (ss. 57, 58(1)-(1aa), including technical and financial resources of applicant. Moreover, the mining registrar or warden must be "satisfied that the applicant is able to effectively explore the land [applied for]" (s. 57(3)). 1
Competing Licences The legislation confers upon the holder of a Miner's Right the ability to apply for a permit over an existing exploration licence, but the use is limited and designed to facilitate metal detector and other small scale exploration activities not in competition with miners (s. 40E). An applicant for a prospecting licence or an exploration licence cannot overstake other person's licence (ss. 43(1) and 57(2e)). As well, a special regime exists for artisanal gold rights for natural persons (ss. 56A and 70). None of the foregoing detract materially from the exclusivity of the main licencing regime. 3
Right to Renew The renewal is with discretion of the Minister and only if satisfied that a prescribed ground for extension exists (ss. 45(1a) and 61(2)); the shedding of land will be necessary in the case of an exploration licence (s. 65) 1
Duration Prospecting licences are valid for up to 8 years (subject to retention) and exploration licences can be held for 5 years and renewed twice (by 5 years and 2 years respectively) (ss. 45 and 61(1)-(2). 5
Mineral Coverage An EL is not mineral specific (s. 61(2)). However, the granting of an EL is on such terms and conditions as the Minister may determine (s. 57(1)). Section 110 gives the Minister a public interest discretion to make a ML mineral specific. 3
Right to Mine The Minister may grant any person a ML for land that is not already subject to a mining tenement (ss. 71 & 76). A holder of a PL or EL will have priority for a ML (ss. 49 and 67). ML confers an exclusive right to mine the land subject to the ML (s. 85(3)). An exception applies for applications for special prospecting licences for gold (s. 85B). Interestingly, however, the Minister has broad discretion under s. 111A to terminate or refuse applications for mining tenements if satisfied •on reasonable grounds in the public interestê that the land should not disturbed or the application should not be granted. The wording here is sufficiently vague and, as result, the power of the Minister sufficiently far-reaching as to introduce a considerable risk to the right to mine. It is therefore possible that the holder of an EL could see an application for a mining lease terminated or refused on whatever grounds the Minister can justify under the broad criteria of s. 111A. It is this level of Ministerial discretion that warrants a low score in this category. 1
Criteria for Mining Rights The requirements for a ML are mostly objective. The Minister shall refuse to grant a ML if the s74A report states there is no significant mineralisation in the area relating to the application (ss. 74(1), 75(8)). 3
Tenure A ML is for a term of 21 years and may be renewed, as of right, for a further term of 21 years (s. 78(1)). 3
Surface Rights Consent from land owners is required for land used for agricultural purposes or anything included in s. 29(2)(a)-(f) (s. 29). Land owners are entitled to compensation for any loss or damage as a result of a mining tenement being granted over their land; in certain cases, land may also be expropriated for mining purposes. The land access and use rules have been thoroughly thought through in relation to competing land users, including private land owners, as evidenced in several provisions (see ss. 20-22, 29-39 and 123(2)). 3
Government Take A holder of a mining tenement is liable to pay rent as prescribed by the regulation (s. 108). The Governor by regulation shall prescribe the royalty rate in respect of the class of minerals obtained form the land (s. 109). The royalty regime is complicated by it being a gross royalty with areas for potential uncertainty; nevertheless, the range for disputes is not great. 3
Transfer Rights Legal title to an ML is not transferable without consent of the Minister (s. 82(1)(d)). An ML may be transferred in accordance with the regulation (r. 75) The right to transfer may be conditional upon any requirements or conditions set by the Minister when granting the ML (s. 71). 3
Change of Control Changes of control are not regualted. A tenement holder may authorise activity by a third party which is authorised under the tenement (s. 118A). A mining tenement may be sold and mortgaged (ss. 119, 119A). 5
EIA Process The EIA process is set out in very clear terms in the Environmental Protection Act, which takes precedence over the Mining Act 1978 (s. 6(1)). The Minister has very wide powers of discretion as to the form, content, timing and procedure of any EIA but will usually follow the EIA administrative procedures 2012 (s. 40 EP Act). 3
Power to Revoke According to s. 97 a mining tenement may be revoked by the Minister where there is a breach of a covenant to pay rent or royalty or for a breach of a covenant included in the lease under s. 82 to which the lease is subject. Alternative fines may apply in place of forfeiture at the discretion of the Minister. As the conditions to which a mining tenement is subject are known at the time of grant and, on a reading of the relevant terms under s. 82, reasonable and clear, an adequate score is awarded. Were the fines under s. 97(5) a guaranteed alternative in replace of forfeiture of title rather than exercised at the discretion of the Minister, the full award would have been given. (See ss. 97 and 82; see also s. 84A(2) and 115B(2)). 3
Age of Legislation 1978 (however substantive amendments were made in 2012) 10
Other Factors The legislation comes across as a patchwork of legislative revisions; the numerous forms of licences and differing means of acquisition (ground vs. map staking) create needless complication in its administration; no doubt a move to a more simplified system involving fewer licencing options and the avoidance of certain details better left in regulations would aid its rating; nevertheless, the legislation doesn't contain other additional provisions that provide serious challenge to the developer so a rating of 10 seems justified. 10
Hutte Score 63
Close report

Environmental Overview Commentary plus sign

AUSTRALIA ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTARY- WESTERN AUSTRALIA

GENERAL

Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is the world’s sixth largest country by area. Spanning over 7.5 million square kilometres, the country is comprised of six states: New South Wales; Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia, and ten territories, two of which (Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory) are located on the mainland. Australia is recognised as a megadiverse country in spite of the fact that around 70% of the country is reportedly arid or semi-arid.

Western Australia is Australia’s largest state by area, covering around 33% of the country and occupying the entire western third of the Australian mainland. Western Australia has an incredibly diverse landscape encompassing Australia’s largest expanse of outback, over 12,000 km of coastline and, to the southwest, areas of forest and shrublands, where many unique species of flora and fauna can be found. The majority of the state’s population lives in the state capital, Perth, with only around 20% located outside the city and its surrounding areas. Western Australia’s climate varies across the state; the central outback area of the region is hot and very dry, with little rainfall, in the north of the state a tropical climate can be found and monsoons can occur during the wet season, while the southwest coastal areas have a Mediterranean style climate, with hot, dry summers and mild but often wet winters.

The state has an array of flora and fauna and many species found there are endemic to the area. The forest areas are home to several endemic tree species and wildflowers, while the state itself hosts 141 mammal species, 25 of which are unique to Western Australia; over 430 species of reptile; and over 450 bird species. The waters of Western Australia also have an abundance of wildlife and coral reefs and include World Heritage site, Shark Bay. Dolphins, reef sharks, manta rays and whale sharks can be found off the coast, with fish species totalling over 1,500. The state has established multiple national parks in order to conserve and protect this wealth of biodiversity.

Climate change, oil spills and overpopulation are some of the environmental challenges faced by the state.

PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION AND REGULATOR

The principal environmental legislation in Western Australia is the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) and its subsequent regulations, the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987 (EP Regulations). The EP Act aims to prevent, control and abate pollution and environmental harm and conserve, preserve, protect and enhance the environment.

The Mining Act 1978 is read and construed subject to the EP Act, with the latter taking precedence over the former in cases where provisions are inconsistent (s. 6 Mining Act).

Other important documentation includes the Environmental Impact Assessment Administrative Procedures 2012 (EIA Procedures), which provide further guidance and clarification on the EIA process contained within the EP Act.

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) is an independent body jointly responsible for the administration of the EP Act, along with the Minister for Environment (Minister). The EPA is responsible for conducting environmental impact assessments (EIA); preparing policies for environmental protection; preparing and publishing guidelines for managing environmental impacts; and providing advice to the Minister. The Minister has the ultimate power to approve or reject proposals submitted under the EP Act and is responsible for handling appeals against decisions of the EPA, amongst other things. In addition, the Office of the Environmental Protection Office (OEPA) was created in 2009 with the purpose of supporting the EPA in conducting EIA and monitoring compliance with Ministerial conditions related to approvals, as well as assisting the EPA in relation to policy development. Unlike the EPA the OEPA is accountable to the Minister, as well as the EPA itself.

EIA PROCESS

The EPA has a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP), which provides for the referral by the DMP of all environmentally significant mineral, petroleum and geothermal proposals to the EPA. Schedule 1 of the MOU outlines the criteria for referral of onshore mineral proposals and includes a significance test, as well as a table for proposals that concern certain areas of land and the relevant actions to be taken.

According to section 74 of the Mining Act an application for a mining lease must be accompanied by a mining proposal or a statement and mineralisation report in the prescribed form. In the case of the latter, according to s. 6(1a) of the Mining Act, only the applicant can refer a proposal to the EPA and section 38(5) of the EP Act does not apply. In all other cases, and according to the terms of the MOU and s. 38(5) of the EP Act, the DMP, as a decision-making authority, must submit to the EPA any proposal that appears to be a significant proposal or a proposal of a prescribed class. The applicant for the mining lease may also submit such proposal directly to the EPA under s. 38(1). Proposals are defined under the EP Act as any project, plan, programme, policy, operation, undertaking or development or change in land use, or amendment of the foregoing. Upon receipt of a proposal the EPA must decide, generally within 28 days unless further information is required, whether the proposal should be assessed or not; written notice of its decision shall be given to the proponent, the individual who submitted the proposal and the relevant decision-making authority. According to the EIA Procedures, the EPA, in reaching its decision, may have regard to certain factors including the values, sensitivity and quality of the environment which is likely to be impacted; the extent of the likely impacts; the consequence of the likely impacts; the resilience of the environment to cope with the impacts; and public concern about the likely effect of the proposal (See s. 7, EIA Procedures).

If the EPA decides that a proposal should be assessed it must determine a level of assessment. There are two possible levels of assessment outlined by the EIA Procedures Assessment on Proponent Information (API), which if further divided into API Category A and API Category B, or Public Environmental Review (PER). In broad terms the API level of assessment will be used in cases where the environmental acceptability or unacceptability is apparent at the referral stage, while the PER level of assessment will be used in cases where one of the following criteria is met: the proposal is of regional and/or state-wide significance; the proposal has several key environmental factors or issues, some which are complex or of a strategic nature; substantial and detailed assessment of the proposal is required to determine whether, and if so how, the environmental issues could be managed; or the level of public concern about the likely effect of the proposal, if implemented, on the environment, warrants a public review period. The criteria, assessment procedure and information requirements for the different levels of assessment are detailed in full under section 10 of the EIA Procedures.

During the assessment of the proposal a proponent can make a change to the proposal if the consent of the EPA is obtained and the EPA has determined that the change is unlikely to significantly increase any potential impact on the environment (s. 43A). Assessments by the EPA can be terminated if the proponent agrees or if the proponent fails to comply with the requirements of the EPA within a reasonable period (as determined by the EPA).

According to section 15 of the EIA Procedures, the EPA may consider a range of sources in assessing the proposal including information from the referral form; API scoping guideline, ESD, API document or PER document; reports from a public inquiry; advice from government agencies; expert advice; and the proponent’s proposed mitigation measures. Upon completion of the assessment the EPA will prepare an assessment report for the Minister (s. 44(1) EP Act). The assessment report must set out what the EPA considers to be the key environmental factors as identified by the assessment and the recommendations of the EPA in relation to whether or not the proposal should be implemented and any conditions and procedures it should be subject to if it is implemented (s. 44(2)). The EPA must provide the assessment report within six weeks of completion of the assessment of the proposal (s. 44(2b)); alternatively the Minister can request the assessment report within a specified period or before a specified date (s. 44(2c)). The Minister shall publish a copy of the report and provide copies to any other minister who may be concerned with the outcome; any decision-making authority related to the proposal; and to the proponent or person who referred the proposal, where required. The Minister shall then make a final decision on the proposal and, in doing so, must consult with all relevant decision-making authorities and other ministers. If agreement cannot be reached the Minister must refer the matter to the Governor (in cases where disagreement is between government ministers) or an appeals committee as appointed by the Minister (in cases where disagreement is between the Minister and a decision-making authority). If the Minister decides the proposal can be implemented, whether subject to certain conditions or not, he is required to provide a statement setting out the implementation agreement or decision to the EPA; the relevant decision-making authorities; the proponent of the proposal; and the person who referred the proposal; the statement must also be published (see s. 45(5)). Following the publication of the statement, once the Minister is satisfied that there is no reason why a proposal should not be implemented, the Minister shall communicate, in writing, his approval of the implementation of the proposal to the relevant decision-making authority (s. 45(7)). If the Minister decides to reject the proposal the relevant parties shall also be notified (s. 45(8)).

Pursuant to section 41 EP Act, decision-making authorities are prohibited from making any decision that could have the effect of causing or allowing the proposal to be implemented (e.g. granting a mining lease) until informed by the EPA that the proposal shall not be assessed or until the authority receives written notification from the Minister that permits the implementation of the proposal. In addition, under s. 41A, any person who takes action to implement a proposal without the proposal having first been approved commits an offence under the EP Act.

Conditions relating to the implementation of a proposal can be changed under section 46, EP Act.

Decisions of the EPA in relation to the assessment report and its recommendations on proposals can be appealed under section 100 of the EP Act. Appeals must be lodged within 14 days of the publication of the relevant material and communicated in writing to the Minister. The Minister will then direct the EPA accordingly based on his decision. The Minister’s decision is final in relation to appeals against decisions of the EPA. Only the proponent of the proposal may appeal the conditions relating to implementation, as set by the Minister; appeals are still made to the Minister but an appeals committee will be established to handle the appeal and the decision of the committee is final. The actual approval of a proposal cannot be challenged.

Federal environmental legislation may apply to projects which have a significant impact on an area of national environmental significance as prescribed by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, which is Australia’s primary federal environmental protection legislation; such projects will require an environmental assessment and the approval of the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment before they can proceed.

Mining Overview Commentary plus sign

AUSTRALIA MINING COMMENTARY- WESTERN AUSTRALIA

GENERAL

Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is an island country located in Oceania and bordered by the Indian and Pacific oceans. According to statistics from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, Australia has the 12th largest economy in the world and the 4th largest in Asia based on GDP. Mining is a significant part of the Australian economy and a key industry in the country, contributing around 7% of GDP, with mineral exports accounting for over 50% of Australia’s total goods and services exports.

Western Australia is the largest of Australia’s six states by area but the 4th largest in terms of population and economy, contributing around 16% of Australia’s GDP in 2013-14. The mining and petroleum industry dominates Western Australia’s economy and, according to government statistics, the state accounts for 58% of the country’s total mineral exploration expenditure. Mineral and petroleum exports make up around 89% of the state’s total merchandise exports, with China a primary trading partner.

The strength of the mining industry in Western Australia highlights the wealth of mineral resources in the state, with iron ore, gold, alumina and nickel primary commodities. Other minerals resources include copper, lead, zinc, salt, uranium and diamonds. Iron ore remains the state’s most valuable export, earning over $56 billion in mineral sales in 2012-13; over 95% of Australia’s iron ore deposits are found in Western Australia.

Western Australia is ranked 10th out of the 122 jurisdictions surveyed by the Fraser Institute in its 2014 Policy Perceptions Index, making it the highest ranked state in Australia.

PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION AND REGULATOR

The principal legislation for the mining industry in Western Australia is the Mining Act 1978 (Act) and the Mining Regulations 1981 (Regulations); also relevant are the Mining Amendment Act 2004 and the Mining Amendment Act 2012. Western Australia also uses State Agreements in relation to its resource sector; State Agreements are legal contracts made between the government of Western Australia and project proponents, which are used in relation to major resource projects and specify the rights, obligations, terms and conditions for the project, as well as providing a framework for ongoing relations and cooperation between the state and the project proponents. These agreements are a way for project proponents to bypass certain elements of mining legislation. Agreements are ratified by Acts of the Western Australian parliament and, according to state records, there are currently over 60 of these agreements in place including, BHP Billiton (Termination of Agreements) Agreement Act 2006; Alumina Refinery (Pinjarra) Agreement Act 1969; Wundowie Charcoal Iron Industry Sale Agreement Act 1974; and Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981.

The Minister for Mines & Petroleum (Minister) is responsible for the administration of the Act (s. 10(1)). In addition, pursuant to section 11, the Department for Mines and Petroleum (DMP) is responsible for assisting the Minister with the administration of the Act. The DMP is also responsible for ensuring that the resource industry of Western Australia is developed and managed responsibly and sustainably, for the benefit of the state’s citizens. The Act also provides for the appointment of mining registrars (s. 11), who, along with the Minister and the DMP’s Director General of Mines (Director), may grant miner’s rights under the Act (s. 40(c)(1)). Under Part VIII of the Act Warden’s Courts are established, which have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions and disputes relating to mining tenements as specified in section 132(1). The powers of a Warden’s Court are further provided for under section 134 which vests in the courts the power to enforce contracts; determine compensation or damages; and make orders for the cessation or suspension of mining operations, amongst other things.

State Agreements are negotiated on a case-by-case basis and the Minister for State Development is responsible for advising proponents.

Mineral rights in Australia are vested in the Crown in right of the States, except for those on land which was granted before the Crown reserved mineral rights, but this latter point is not of particular relevance in Western Australia (s. 9).

GRANT AND FORMS OF MINERAL TITLE

Under the Act a dealing or interest will not have any legal effect unless formally registered in accordance with section 103(c).

The following types of mining leases and licences are provided for:

  • Prospecting Licence (PL): Grants the holder the exclusive access to carry out prospecting activities on an area no greater than 200 hectares (s. 40 and s. 48). Applications shall occur in the manner prescribed under section 41 and must be accompanied by the first year of rent; holders are permitted to possess multiple PL (s. 40(3)). PL are granted for a period of four years, extendable for a further four years if the Minister is satisfied a prescribed ground for extension exists and, if the PL has retention status, by a further period or periods of four years (s. 45). PL cannot be granted over land that is already subject to a mining tenement (s. 43(1)) and licences are always subject to the conditions listed in section 46, as well as further conditions if the Minister considers them necessary. PL are transferable and PL holders have priority for grant of mining leases for the duration of the licence (s. 49). Holders are required to comply with prescribed expenditure conditions; file reports of work and expenditure as required; and provide the Minister with geological samples as requested (s. 50-51A).

 

  • Exploration Licence (EL): Provides the holder with exclusive access to explore for minerals on an area no more than 70 blocks arranged in the prescribed manner, or 200 blocks if the land has been designated by the Minister under s. 57A(1). EL cannot be granted for land that is already the subject of a mining tenement. Applications must be made in the prescribed form and accompanied by the first year of rent (s. 58); applicants are required to state the technical and financial resources available for exploration activities. EL are granted for a period of 5 years, renewable for a further 5-year period and subsequent 2-year periods, if the Minister is satisfied that a prescribed ground for extension exists (s. 61); following renewal the surrender of 40% of the number of blocks (or the nearest whole number) for which the original EL applied will be required, generally on the 6th anniversary of the licence, under section 65. Persons may be granted more than one EL (s. 57(2g)). Holders are required to comply with expenditure conditions and certain other conditions relating to the licence (s. 63 and s. 63A). EL shall not be transferred, in whole or in part, during the first year unless certain conditions apply or express consent of the Minister is obtained (s. 64) but may be transferred subsequently. EL holders have priority for grant of mining leases for the duration of the licence (s. 67).

 

  • Mining Lease (ML): Grants the holder exclusive right to access the land, carry out mining operations and extract minerals. Persons may hold more than one ML (s. 72). ML cannot be granted on land which is already the subject of a mining tenement. Applications must be in the prescribed form and accompanied by a mining proposal or a statement and a prescribed mineralisation report (s. 74). Land surveys are required in relation to ML but miners do not need to carry out surveys prior to the granting of the licence (s. 80(1)). ML are granted for an initial period of 21 years, renewable for a further 21-year period subject to the conditions of the Act (s. 78(1)). All ML are subject to certain conditions including the conditions and covenants of section 82, which contains provisions for the payment of royalties and expenditure conditions. Under section 110 the Minister has the power to make a ML mineral specific. ML may be transferred.

 

  • Retention Licence (RL): Under the Act, certain EL and PL which were granted at specific times, and all ML holders have the option to apply for a RL in respect of whole or part of the land covered by the original licence. RL grant the holder the right to enter the land and carry out further exploration for minerals (s. 70J). Applications for RL must be made in the prescribed form and must include a statutory declaration that there is an identified mineral resource in the area and mining of that resource is impracticable due to one of the reasons prescribed in section 70C(2). RL are granted for a maximum 5-year period, renewable for a further 5-year period (s. 70E). Holders may be required to submit a programme of work and be subject to such conditions as defined in the Act or set by the Minister. RL may be transferred. RL holders shall have priority for grant of mining leases (s. 70L). In addition, at any time during the term of the RL the Minister can require the RL holder to show cause why a ML should not be applied for and, if cause is not provided or deemed insufficient, require a holder to apply for a ML within 60 days of notice (s. 70M).

All transfers of mining tenements must take place in accordance with s. 75 of the Regulations; mining tenements may also be sold and mortgaged (s. 119 and s. 199A). No mining tenement allows for the prospecting, exploration or mining of iron unless the Minister confirms such activity in writing (s. 111).

The Act also provides for several other types of licence. Special Prospecting Licences (SPL) provided for under section 56A are used for the prospecting of gold. SPL can only be granted to natural persons, allow only for the prospecting of gold, and may be granted on land that is already the subject of a mining tenement, although holders of a primary tenement have the opportunity to object to the granting of a SPL. Holders of a SPL can further apply for a mining lease for gold on the relevant area. General Purpose Leases are also provided for under the Act which allow holders to occupy areas of land, not exceeding 10 hectares, in order to carry out activities associated with mining operations (s. 87). Finally the Act also provides for Miscellaneous Leases, which may be obtained for activities expressly stated within the licence itself (s. 91).

DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS

In relation to private land, the written consent of the owner and occupier of the land is needed in order to obtain a mining tenement over certain categories of private land, including land used for agriculture (s. 29). This effectively grants private landowners a veto over developments, a matter of particular importance in the south west of the state, which is heavily farmed. Further, section 111A of the Act provides the Minister with a public interest discretion, granting him the authority to refuse or terminate applications for mining tenements. Permits may be obtained for persons wishing to enter private land to search for minerals or mark out mining tenements (s. 30). Permits cannot exceed a term of 30 days and holders must notify the occupier of the land in accordance with section 31 Act. Compensation must also be paid to the owner and occupier of the land and must be agreed before mining operations commence (s. 35). In cases where agreement cannot be reached the Warden’s Court has the power to determine compensation.

Mine closure plans, as defined under section 70(1) are required as part of the ML application process and must be reviewed at certain times (at least every 3 years unless otherwise approved) throughout the duration of the ML (s. 84AA). Rent must be paid under section 108 and royalties must be paid when minerals are obtained from a mining tenement, the rates for which are detailed in the Regulations (see s. 86 Regulations). Additionally, as discussed, mining tenements are issued with expenditure conditions and obligations and non-compliance may result in the forfeiting of the licence.

The Act is read and construed subject to the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), with the latter taking precedence if provisions are inconsistent (s. 6 Act). The DMP has an agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which provides for the referral, to the EPA, of all ‘environmentally significant’ proposals. Proposals are reviewed by the EPA in order to determine if an assessment is required; there are two levels of assessment which may be used namely, Assessment on Proponent Information and Public Environmental Review. Following assessment a report will be prepared for consideration by the Minister who has the authority to decide whether the proposal may be implemented or not and whether any conditions will apply. Under the EP Act decision-making authorities, such as the DMP, are prohibited from making decisions which may allow the proposal to be implemented, until informed by the EPA or the Minister as to the status of the proposal (s. 41 EP Act).

Federal environmental legislation may apply to projects which have a significant impact on an area of national environmental significance as prescribed by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, which is Australia’s primary federal environmental protection legislation; such projects will require an environmental assessment and the approval of the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment before they can proceed.

Finally the Foreign Investment Review Board will be need to be notified in relation to certain investments by foreign persons in Western Australia, as prescribed by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

See Western Australia Environmental Regulation.

Technical Documents plus sign